WILBANKS v. SIMMONS

Filing 31

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 08/18/2014, that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 20 ) be denied.(Taylor, Abby)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA DANIEL EARL WILBANKS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. C/O ROBBIE SIMMONS, Defendant. 1:13CV167 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE On August 8, 2014, the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge ordered that action on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 20) be deferred to give Plaintiff an opportunity to file a validly executed affidavit in support of his opposition to said Motion. (Docket Entry 29 at 20.) Plaintiff has now submitted an affidavit that complies with 28 U.S.C. § 1746. (See Docket Entry 30.) Furthermore, for the reasons set out in the previous Order (see Docket Entry 29 at 13-19), Plaintiff’s Affidavit would allow a fact finder to conclude that Defendant intentionally applied force to Plaintiff in an unnecessary and malicious fashion in contravention of the Eight Amendment. IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Defendant’s Motion Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 20) be denied. /s/ L. Patrick Auld L. Patrick Auld United States Magistrate Judge August 18, 2014 for

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?