SMITH v. BRANDON

Filing 14

ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 07/02/2015; that Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 6 ) is GRANTED and the Petition (ECF No. 1 ) is DENIED. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued. (Garland, Leah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA DONALD R. SMITH, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL DAVIS, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:13CV606 ORDER The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on May 19, 2015, was served on the parties in this action. (ECF No. 11.) Petitioner filed Objections to the Recommendation. (ECF No. 13.)1 The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 6) is GRANTED and the Petition (ECF No. 1) is DENIED. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. Finding no Petitioner’s objections consisted of a single page with a boilerplate statement denouncing the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation without specifically identifying any alleged errors. (See ECF No. 13.) Petitioner’s failure to specifically object to the Recommendation waives any review. Page v. Lee, 337 F.3d 411, 416 n.3 (4th Cir. 2003). Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the Recommendation for any errors. 1 substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued. This, the 2nd day of July, 2015. /s/ Loretta C. Biggs United States District Judge 2 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?