CUSH-EL v. MICHAEL et al
Filing
9
ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 9/9/2014, that Plaintiff's filing (Doc. 5 ), construed as a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), be DENIED. (Butler, Carol)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
PEACE ELLUVASUNALLAH CUSH-EL,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA AND,
WAYNE MICHAEL, et al.,
Defendant.
1:14cv219
ORDER
The Text Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b) and,
on August 22, 2014, was served on the parties in this action.
Plaintiff objected to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation within
the time prescribed by section 636.
(Doc. 8.)
The court has reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge’s
report
to
which
objection
was
made
and
has
made
a
de
novo
determination, which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s report.
The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s filing (Doc. 5),
construed as a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b),
be DENIED.
/s/
Thomas D. Schroeder
United States District Judge
September 9, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?