CUSH-EL v. MICHAEL et al

Filing 9

ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 9/9/2014, that Plaintiff's filing (Doc. 5 ), construed as a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), be DENIED. (Butler, Carol)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA PEACE ELLUVASUNALLAH CUSH-EL, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA AND, WAYNE MICHAEL, et al., Defendant. 1:14cv219 ORDER The Text Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b) and, on August 22, 2014, was served on the parties in this action. Plaintiff objected to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation within the time prescribed by section 636. (Doc. 8.) The court has reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination, which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s filing (Doc. 5), construed as a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), be DENIED. /s/ Thomas D. Schroeder United States District Judge September 9, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?