HARVEY v. DARDEN RESTAURANT, INC.

Filing 26

ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 05/18/2015, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [ECF No. 21 ], which is affirmed and adopted, and that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Compel Arbitration [ECF No. 16 ] is GRANTED to the extent that the parties are compelled to arbitration and this matter is stayed pending arbitration proceedings. FURTHER that this case is administratively closed. Either party may file a motion to reopen the matter, if appropriate, without payment of filing fees. (Taylor, Abby)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
KEOSHA HARVEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
DARDEN RESTAURANT, INC., d/b/a
RED LOBSTER,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:14CV258

ORDER
On March 31, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed
and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff filed Objections
[ECF No. 24] within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The Court has reviewed
Plaintiff’s Objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United
States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation [ECF No. 21], which is affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
Amended Complaint and Compel Arbitration [ECF No. 16] is GRANTED to the extent that
the parties are compelled to arbitration and this matter is stayed pending arbitration
proceedings.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is administratively closed. Either party
may file a motion to reopen the matter, if appropriate, without payment of filing fees.
This, the 18th day of May, 2015.
/s/ Loretta C. Biggs
United States District Judge