RAYO v. PERRY

Filing 14

ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 03/25/2015 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation; that Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 5 ) is GRANTED and that the Petition (Doc. 2 ) is DENIED. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued. (Garland, Leah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA TEODORO CAMPOS RAYO, Petitioner, v. FRANK L. PERRY, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:14CV326 ORDER The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on February 9, 2015, was served on the parties in this action. Petitioner filed objections to the Recommendation. (Docs. 12, 13.) The Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation. The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 5) is GRANTED and that the Petition (Doc. 2) is DENIED. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued. This, the 25th day of March, 2015. /s/ Loretta C. Biggs United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?