HOLMES v. BRYANT et al

Filing 6

ORDER signed by JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 07/22/2014, that theCourt has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. # 3 , which is affirmed and adopted, and that this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted and for seeking damages from defendants who are immune from such relief. (Taylor, Abby)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ANTONE A. HOLMES,
Plaintiff,
v.
SGT WILLIS RICHARD BRYANT,
et al.,
Defendant(s).

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 1:14CV418

ORDER
On June 19, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed
and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed objections
[Doc. #5] to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The
Court has reviewed Petitioner’s objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance
of the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation [Doc. #3], which is affirmed and
adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted and for seeking
damages from defendants who are immune from such relief.
This, the 22nd day of July, 2014.
United States District Judge