BAGWELL v. DIMON et al

Filing 132

ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 12/22/2015, adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (ECF No. 117 ) and Plaintiff's Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (ECF No 99 ) is DENIED. FURTHER that, in light of the Judgment entered by this Court against Plaintiff (ECF No. 98 ) dismissing Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, Plaintiff's motions for partial summary judgment (ECF Nos. 120 , 122 , 124 , 126 , 128 ) are DENIED as moot. (Daniel, J)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
DONALD RICHARD BAGWELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMIE DIMON, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:14CV495

ORDER
The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court
in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on November 17, 2015, was served on the parties
in this action. (ECF Nos. 117, 118.) Plaintiff filed an Objection to the Recommendation
(ECF No. 119). The Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate
Judge’s Recommendation to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination
in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. The Court hereby adopts the
Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation.
Plaintiff has further filed five motions for partial summary judgment (ECF Nos. 120,
122, 124, 126, 128).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or
Amend Judgment (ECF No. 99) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in light of the Judgment entered by this Court
against Plaintiff (ECF No. 98) dismissing Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, Plaintiff’s motions
for partial summary judgment (ECF Nos. 120, 122, 124, 126, 128) are DENIED as moot.
This, the 22nd day of December, 2015.

/s/ Loretta C. Biggs
United States District Judge

2