BOLDER v. MERRITT

Filing 17

ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 06/11/2015, that the court has reviewed and hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10 ) is GRANTED IN PART, to the extent Defendant seeks abstention of this case based upon the Younger doctrine. 401 U.S. 37 (1971). FURTHER that this action is STAYED pending the resolution of the state court's criminal proceedings. (Taylor, Abby)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WILLIE J. BOLDER, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK T. MERRITT, JR., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:14CV628 ORDER The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on May 15, 2015, was served on the parties in this action. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by section 636. The court has reviewed and hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge=s Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10) is GRANTED IN PART, to the extent Defendant seeks abstention of this case based upon the Younger doctrine. 401 U.S. 37 (1971). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is STAYED pending the resolution of the state court’s criminal proceedings. /s/ Thomas D. Schroeder United States District Judge June 11, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?