BOLDER v. MERRITT
Filing
17
ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 06/11/2015, that the court has reviewed and hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10 ) is GRANTED IN PART, to the extent Defendant seeks abstention of this case based upon the Younger doctrine. 401 U.S. 37 (1971). FURTHER that this action is STAYED pending the resolution of the state court's criminal proceedings. (Taylor, Abby)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WILLIE J. BOLDER,
Plaintiff,
v.
PATRICK T. MERRITT, JR.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:14CV628
ORDER
The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was
filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on
May 15, 2015, was served on the parties in this action.
No
objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by section
636.
The court has reviewed and hereby adopts the Magistrate
Judge=s Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
(Doc. 10) is GRANTED IN PART, to the extent Defendant seeks
abstention of this case based upon the Younger doctrine.
401 U.S.
37 (1971).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is STAYED pending the
resolution of the state court’s criminal proceedings.
/s/
Thomas D. Schroeder
United States District Judge
June 11, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?