BELTON v. COLVIN
Filing
17
ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 09/29/2015, that the court therefore ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and that Plaintiff's motion for judgment reversing the Commissioner (Doc. 6 ) is DENIED, Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 10 ) is GRANTED, the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Taylor, Abby)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SHARI LYNN BELTON,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
ACTING Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
1:14CV777
ORDER
On August 24, 2015, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b),
the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed
and served on the parties in this action, and a copy was given to
the court.
Within the time limitation set forth in the statute,
counsel for Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation (Doc. 15),
and Defendant filed a response (Doc. 16).
The court has made a de novo determination of those portions
of the Recommendation to which objection has been made.
None of
the
of
the
ADOPTS
the
objections
Magistrate
change
Judge’s
the
report.
substance
The
of
court
the
outcome
therefore
Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for judgment
reversing the Commissioner (Doc. 6) is DENIED, Defendant’s motion
for
judgment
on
the
pleadings
(Doc.
10)
is
GRANTED,
the
Commissioner’s decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, and
this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
A Judgment dismissing
this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.
/s/
Thomas D. Schroeder
United States District Judge
September 28, 2015
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?