BELTON v. COLVIN

Filing 17

ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 09/29/2015, that the court therefore ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and that Plaintiff's motion for judgment reversing the Commissioner (Doc. 6 ) is DENIED, Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 10 ) is GRANTED, the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Taylor, Abby)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SHARI LYNN BELTON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 1:14CV777 ORDER On August 24, 2015, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and served on the parties in this action, and a copy was given to the court. Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, counsel for Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation (Doc. 15), and Defendant filed a response (Doc. 16). The court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection has been made. None of the of the ADOPTS the objections Magistrate change Judge’s the report. substance The of court the outcome therefore Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for judgment reversing the Commissioner (Doc. 6) is DENIED, Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 10) is GRANTED, the Commissioner’s decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. /s/ Thomas D. Schroeder United States District Judge September 28, 2015 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?