FRALEY v. PERRY

Filing 15

ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 9/14/2015 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation 12 ; that Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 7 ) be GRANTED and that the petition be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Finding neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Sheets, Jamie)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SHAWN G. FRALEY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. FRANK L. PERRY, Respondent. 1:14CV947 ORDER The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on August 6, 2015, was served on the parties Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation. in this action. (Doc. 14.) The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination, which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 7) be GRANTED and that the petition be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Finding neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting 1 In doing so, the court notes that the Recommendation’s reference to case 10CRS2867 (Doc. 12 at 1) is a typographical error and should read case 10CRS2876. (See Doc. 14 at 2.) the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued. A Judgment dismissing this action will be contemporaneously with this Order. /s/ Thomas D. Schroeder United States District Judge September 14, 2015 2 entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?