PRENTICE V. BOGGS ET AL
Filing
12
ORDER ON RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 02/25/2015. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge 's Recommendation 9 , which is affirmed and adopted. IT IS ORDERED that this action is filed and DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint on the proper § forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation. (Coyne, Michelle)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
STEVEN D. PRENTICE,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
LISA BLUE BOGGS, et al.,
Defendant.
1:14CV1049
ORDER
On January 16, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed
and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff filed objections [Doc.
#11] within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s
objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States
Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation [Doc. #9], which is affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is filed and DISMISSED sua sponte
without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects
the defects cited in the Recommendation.
This, the 25th day of February, 2015.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?