TREECE v. COLVIN
Filing
26
ORDER signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR on 03/25/2016. This Court, therefore, adopts the Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in its entirety. ORDERED that the Commissioner's Motion for Firs t Extension of Time [Doc. # 14 is DENIED AS MOOT, that Mr. Treece's Motions for Default Judgment [Docs. # 11 , 12 , 15 are DENIED, and that the Commissioner's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. # 18 is GRANTED. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Taylor, Abby)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLES A. TREECE,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:14CV1077
ORDER
On January 19, 2016, the Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation of the
United States Magistrate Judge (“Recommendation”) was filed with this Court in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on the same day, was served on the parties
in this action. [Docs. #21, 22.] Plaintiff Charles A. Treece (“Treece”) filed timely
Objections to the Recommendation to which Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin
(“Commissioner”) responded. [Docs. #23, 25.]
This Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Recommendation to
which objections were made and has made a de novo determination in accord with
the Recommendation. This Court, therefore, adopts the Memorandum Opinion and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in its entirety.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Motion for First
Extension of Time [Doc. # 14] is DENIED AS MOOT, that Mr. Treece’s Motions for
Default Judgment [Docs. # 11, 12, 15] are DENIED, and that the Commissioner’s
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. # 18] is GRANTED. A Judgment
dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.
This the 25th day of March, 2016.
/s/ N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?