FULLARD v. PERRY

Filing 5

ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 03/31/, that the court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, and that this action be filed, but then dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition which corrects the defects of the current Petition. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Taylor, Abby)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA REGINALD FULLARD, Petitioner, v. FRANK PERRY, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:15CV196 ORDER The Order and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on March 12, 2015, was served on the parties in this action. (Doc. 2.) Petitioner objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. 4.) The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action be filed, but then dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition which corrects the defects of the current Petition. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. This, the 31st day of March, 2015. /s/ Loretta C. Biggs United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?