TUNSTALL v. PERRY et al

Filing 66

ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 09/19/2016 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation; that Peter Woglom's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 30 ) and Carmen Hendricks' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 45 ) are GRANTED, and that the claims as to these Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice. (Garland, Leah)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLES ALONZO TUNSTALL,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
FRANK L. PERRY, et al.,
Defendants.

1:15CV226

ORDER
On August 3, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed
and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (ECF Nos. 52, 53.)
Plaintiff filed objections (ECF No. 54) within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The
Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s objections de novo and finds that they do not change the
substance of the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (ECF No. 52), which is hereby affirmed
and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Peter Woglom’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No.
30) and Carmen Hendricks’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 45) are GRANTED, and that the
claims as to these Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice.
This, the 19th day of September, 2016.

/s/ Loretta C. Biggs
United States District Judge