GOODWIN v. CLARK, ET AL.

Filing 15

ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 12/28/2015. On December 1, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and Notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (ECF Nos. 12 , 13 .) Plai ntiff filed Objections (ECF No. 14 ) within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (ECF No. 12 ), which is hereby affirmed and adopted, and that Plaintiff's Rule 59(e) Motion (ECF No. 11 ) is DENIED. (Taylor, Abby)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESLEY FOUST-GRAHAM GOODWIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
SUSAN KELLY GOODWIN CLARK, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:15CV458

ORDER
On December 1, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed
and Notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (ECF Nos. 12, 13.)
Plaintiff filed Objections (ECF No. 14) within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The
Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s objections de novo and finds that they do not change the
substance of the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (ECF No. 12), which is
hereby affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Rule 59(e) Motion (ECF No. 11) is
DENIED.
This, the 28th day of December, 2015.

/s/ Loretta C. Biggs
United States District Judge