STEWART v. GODFREY et al

Filing 8

ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 02/01/2016 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation; that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend (ECF No. 4 ) is DENIED, and that this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for being frivolous or malicious or for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Garland, Leah)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ROBERT KENNETH STEWART,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
NEIL GODFREY, et al.,
Defendants.

1:15CV802

ORDER
On January 5, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed
and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (ECF Nos. 5, 6.) Plaintiff
Robert K. Stewart filed Objections (ECF No. 7) within the time limit prescribed by Section
636. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s objections de novo and finds that they do not change
the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (ECF No. 5), which is
hereby affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend (ECF
No. 4) is DENIED, and that this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for
being frivolous or malicious or for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
This, the 1st day of February, 2016.

/s/ Loretta C. Biggs
United States District Judge