DUNBAR v. DANIELS

Filing 50

ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 03/02/2017, that the respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. 13 , is GRANTED, that the petitioner's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Doc. 32 , is DENIED, and that the Petition, Doc. 1 , is DISMISSED as untimely. A Judgment dismissing this action without issuance of a certificate of appealability will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Taylor, Abby)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA KENNETH LEONARD DUNBAR, Petitioner, v. DENNIS DANIELS, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:16-CV-518 ORDER The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on January 27, 2017, was served on the parties in this action. The petitioner filed objections to the Recommendation. Doc. 49. The Court has reviewed the objection and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s report. Specifically, the petitioner contends that he has only limited access to legal material and that North Carolina Prisoners Legal Services has not assisted him. While there might be some cases where this kind of problem might result in a short period of equitable tolling, the petitioner’s general assertions do not excuse the multi-year delay here. The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation in full. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. 13, is GRANTED, that the petitioner’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Doc. 32, is DENIED, and that the Petition, Doc. 1, is DISMISSED as untimely. A Judgment dismissing this action without issuance of a certificate of appealability will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. This the 2nd day of March, 2017. ________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?