FOSTER v. SLAGLE
Filing
11
ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 7/12/2017 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation 8 ; that Respondent's motion to dismiss this action for being filed beyond the one-year limitation period (Doc. 4 ) is GRANTED, that Petitioner's Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED, and that this action be, and is hereby, dismissed with prejudice. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued. (Sheets, Jamie)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
LUCAS MICHAEL FOSTER,
Petitioner,
v.
MIKE SLAGLE,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:16CV523
ORDER
On May 22, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge’s
Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Docs. 8, 9.) Petitioner filed
objections (Doc. 10) to the Recommendation within the time limit
prescribed by Section 636.
This court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the
Recommendation to which objections were made and has made a
de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate
Judge=s Recommendation. The additional contentions raised in the
objections would not provide a basis for equitable tolling or
trigger a later running of the statute of limitation. Therefore,
this court therefore adopts the Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent’s motion to dismiss
this action for being filed beyond the one-year limitation
period (Doc. 4) is GRANTED, that Petitioner’s Petition under 28
U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State
Custody (Doc. 1) is DENIED, and that this action be, and is
hereby, dismissed with prejudice. A Judgment dismissing this
action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.
Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of
a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable
procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued.
This the 12th day of July, 2017.
______________________________________
United States District Judge
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?