GLOVER V. BRADFORD

Filing 9

ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 09/02/2016 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, that this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling her claims on the proper forms and in the proper forum, setting out the legal and factual basis for the claims. (Garland, Leah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SHARRON MARIE GLOVER, Plaintiff, v. JAMES BRADFORD, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:16CV532 ORDER The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on July 14, 2016, was served on the parties in this action. Defendant did not file any objections within the time permitted. Because no objections were filed, the court need not conduct a de novo review. The court has conducted the appropriate review, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is hereby adopted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling her claims on the proper forms and in the proper forum, setting out the legal and factual basis for the claims. /s/ Thomas D. Schroeder United States District Judge September 2, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?