EMEZIE v. DOCKERY et al

Filing 8

ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 09/08/2016 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation; that this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint in the proper forum setting out the basis for whatever claims he intends to pursue. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Garland, Leah)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
KINGSLEY O. EMEZIE,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFERY DOCKERY, et al.,
Defendants.

1:16CV568

ORDER
On July 14, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed and
notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (ECF Nos. 4, 5.) Within the
time limit prescribed by § 636, Plaintiff Emezie filed a letter that included what the Court has
construed as Objections (ECF No. 6). The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Objections de novo
and finds that they do not change the substance of the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation
which is hereby affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, without
prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint in the proper forum setting out the basis for
whatever claims he intends to pursue. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered
contemporaneously with this Order.
This, the 8th day of September, 2016.
/s/ Loretta C. Biggs
United States District Judge