HYDE-EL v. MILLER et al

Filing 6

ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 10/4/2016 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation 3 ; that this action be filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Sheets, Jamie)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA MASON WHITE HYDE-EL, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. D.T. MILLER, II, et al., Defendant(s). 1:16CV897 ORDER The Order and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on August 4, 2016, was served on the parties in this action. (ECF Nos. 3, 4.) Plaintiff objected to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. (ECF No. 5.) The Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action be filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. This, the 4th day of October, 2016. /s/ Loretta C. Biggs United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?