MAUNEY v. CUGINO et al
Filing
6
ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 04/05/2017, that this action is DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. (Taylor, Abby)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
BRADLEY L. MAUNEY,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
A.W. CUGINO, II, et al.,
Defendants.
1:17CV88
ORDER
On March 15, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge=s Recommendation was filed
and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636. Plaintiff filed objections
(ECF No. 5) within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The Court has reviewed
Plaintiff=s objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United
States Magistrate Judge=s Recommendation (ECF No. 3), which is hereby affirmed and
adopted. If Petitioner needs additional forms, he may contact the Clerk=s Office. However,
the Court cannot provide Plaintiff with legal advice.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED sua sponte without
prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper forms, which corrects the defects
cited in the Magistrate Judge=s Recommendation.
This, the 5th day of April, 2017.
/s/ Loretta C. Biggs
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?