WILLIAMS v. USA

Filing 7

ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 10/19/2017, that this action is filed and then dismissed sua sponte for Petitioner's failure to seek certification for a second or successive § 2255 motion by filing a Motion for Authorization in the court of appeals as required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255 and 2244 and Fourth Circuit Local Rule 22(d). Finding neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. (Taylor, Abby)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

ISSAC LAMONT WILLIAMS,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.

1:17CV607

ORDER
The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was
filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on
July 25, 2017, was served on the parties in this action.
3, 4.)

Petitioner objected to the Recommendation.

(Docs.

(Doc. 6.)

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the
Magistrate Judge’s report to which objection was made and has made
a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s
report.

The

court

therefore

adopts

the

Magistrate

Judge’s

Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is filed and then
dismissed

sua

sponte

for

Petitioner’s

failure

to

seek

certification for a second or successive § 2255 motion by filing
a Motion for Authorization in the court of appeals as required by
28 U.S.C. §§ 2255 and 2244 and Fourth Circuit Local Rule 22(d).
Finding neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the
denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a

debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is
DENIED.

/s/
Thomas D. Schroeder
United States District Judge
October 19, 2017

2