HALPERIN V. BERRYHILL

Filing 26

ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 09/27/2019 affirming and adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, that Plaintiff's Motion to for Judgment Reversing or Remanding for Further Proceedings the Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, (ECF No. 12 ), is DENIED, that the Commissioner's First Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, (ECF No. 17 ), is GRANTED, and that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Garland, Leah)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
LAURA SUE HALPERIN,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
ANDREW SAUL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security1,
Defendant.

1:18CV396

ORDER
On August 2, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed,
and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff filed objections,
(ECF No. 25), within the time limit prescribed by Section 636.
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s objections de novo and finds that they do not change
the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, (ECF No. 21), which
is affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision finding no
disability is AFFIRMED, that Plaintiff’s Motion to for Judgment Reversing or Remanding for
Further Proceedings the Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, (ECF No. 12), is
DENIED, that the Commissioner’s First Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, (ECF No.
17), is GRANTED, and that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.
This, the 27th day of September 2019.
/s/ Loretta C. Biggs
United States District Judge
1 Andres Saul became the Commissioner of Social Security on June 17, 2019. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, Andrew Saul should be substituted for Nancy A. Berryhill as the Defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken
to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).