ALLEN v. WIRE, et al.

Filing 73

ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 9/19/2022 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation 69 ; that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 62 ) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Sheets, Jamie)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA DERRICK ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. TED WIRE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:19CV689 ORDER The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on August 29, 2022, was served on the parties in this action. 69, 70.) (Docs. Plaintiff filed an objection to the Recommendation, and Defendants responded. (Docs. 71, 72.) Plaintiff has failed in his objection to articulate any challenge to any proposed finding or recommendation of the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, and thus the court need not conduct a de novo review. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The court has appropriately reviewed the Recommendation and has made a determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 62) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. Case 1:19-cv-00689-TDS-LPA Document 73 Filed 09/19/22 Page 1 of 2 A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. /s/ Thomas D. Schroeder United States District Judge September 19, 2022 2 Case 1:19-cv-00689-TDS-LPA Document 73 Filed 09/19/22 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?