BARNES v. GIBSON et al
Filing
7
ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR. on 10/26/2024; that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 3 ), is ADOPTED. FURTHER ORDERED that this action be filed and is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which is accompanied by the applicable $402.00 filing fee. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (sh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CORNELIUS BARNES,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAKAYLA Z. GIBSON, SEGARA,
RANSOM, and BULLARD,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:23-cv-1081
ORDER
On December 19, 2023, the United States Magistrate Judge’s
Order and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) was filed, and
notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
(Docs. 3, 4, 6.) No objections were filed within the time
prescribed by Section 636.
Therefore, the court need not make a de novo review and the
Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is hereby adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommendation, (Doc. 3), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
that this action be filed and is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper §
1983 forms, which is accompanied by the applicable $402.00
filing fee.
A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered
contemporaneously with this Order.
This the 26th day of March, 2024.
__________________________________
United States District Judge
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?