BOYKINS v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al

Filing 7

ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 5 ), is ADOPTED. FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation. Signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 03/26/2024. (at)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA RODERICK BOYKINS, Plaintiff, v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, FNU LOCKLEAR, DEAN LOCKLEAR, FNU SCOTT, and TAMARA RUSH, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:24-cv-37 ORDER On February 1, 2024, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Order and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) was filed, and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Docs. 5, 6.) No objections were filed within the time prescribed by Section 636. Therefore, the court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is hereby adopted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, (Doc. 5), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. This the 26th day of March, 2024. __________________________________ United States District Judge –2–

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?