BOYKINS v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
Filing
7
ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 5 ), is ADOPTED. FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation. Signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 03/26/2024. (at)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
RODERICK BOYKINS,
Plaintiff,
v.
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL
INSTITUTION, FNU LOCKLEAR,
DEAN LOCKLEAR, FNU SCOTT,
and TAMARA RUSH,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:24-cv-37
ORDER
On February 1, 2024, the United States Magistrate Judge’s
Order and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) was filed, and
notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
(Docs. 5, 6.) No objections were filed within the time
prescribed by Section 636.
Therefore, the court need not make a de novo review and the
Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is hereby adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s
Recommendation, (Doc. 5), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff
filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which
corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation.
A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered
contemporaneously with this Order.
This the 26th day of March, 2024.
__________________________________
United States District Judge
–2–
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?