Atkins v. Polk

Filing 35

ORDER granting 30 Motion to Amend/Correct Petitioner's Summary Judgment Motion; granting Petitioner's 4 Motion for Expansion of the Record. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 4/1/11. (siw)

Download PDF
Atkins v. Polk Doc. 35 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:06cv372 RANDY LYNN ATKINS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) MARVIN POLK, Warden, ) Central Prison ) Raleigh, North Carolina, ) ) Respondent. ) ___________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Petitioner Randy Lynn Atkins's Motion for Expansion of the Record [Doc. 4] and Petitioner's Motion to Amend and Correct Petitioner's Summary Judgment Motion [Doc. 30]. In conjunction with the filing of his habeas petition, and in anticipation that the Respondent would file the transcripts of the state court proceedings, Petitioner has filed a motion seeking to expand the record to include an additional four volumes of state court records. [Doc. 4]. There being no opposition to Petitioner's motion, and for cause shown, Petitioner's Motion for Expansion of the Record [Doc. 4] will be allowed, and the Court will consider the exhibits manually filed in support of Dockets.Justia.com Petitioner's Petition as part of the record in this case. Additionally, Petitioner moves to correct his Summary Judgment Motion in order to correct a typographical error. [Doc. 30]. The Respondent does not oppose Petitioner's Motion to Amend and Correct. For cause shown, Petitioner's Motion [Doc. 30] will be allowed, and the Court will consider Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment as amended. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Expansion of the Record [Doc. 4] and Petitioner's Motion to Amend and Correct Petitioner's Summary Judgment Motion [Doc. 30] are ALLOWED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: April 1, 2011 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?