Burgess v. Eforce Media, Inc. et al

Filing 37

ORDER denying 31 Motion for Reconsideration of 18 Order. Signed by Judge Lacy Thornburg on 8/14/07. (ejb)

Download PDF
Burgess v. Eforce Media, Inc. et al Doc. 37 Case 1:07-cv-00231-LHT-DLH Document 37 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL NO. 1:07CV231 C. BURGESS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V s. ) ) EFORCE MEDIA, INC.; IWIZARD ) HOLDING, INC.; ADKNOWLEDGE, ) INC.; BASEBALL EXPRESS, INC.; ) ALLEN-EDMONDS SHOE ) CORPORATION; INTERSEARCH ) GROUP, INC.; TRUSCO ) MANUFACTURING COMPANY; ) PRICEGRABBER.COM, INC.; ) SHOPZILLA, INC.; DAZADI, INC.; ) and SIX THREE ZERO ENTERPRISES,) LLC, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's motion for the Court to reconsider its Order of July 19, 2007, striking the Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal. Even though the Plaintiff's legal opinion is that the Court's Order is not "legally correct," he provides no case law or other statutory authority Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:07-cv-00231-LHT-DLH Document 37 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 2 of 2 2 upon which to base such an opinion. The Court finds the motion to be without merit and the Plaintiff is warned against future frivolous filings. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. Signed: August 14, 2007

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?