Bridges v. Murray et al

Filing 71

ORDER - The matter is hereby set for trial for the December 6, 2010 term at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 401 W. Trade St. Charlotte, North Carolina 28202. The North Carolina Department of Corrections is ordered to transport the Pl aintiff, Danny Ray Bridges (inmate #0044717, DOB 4/14/1960), so that he may be present for the conduct of such trial. The Department is further ordered to notify the United States Marshal for the Western District of North Carolina of the transportation schedule for the Plaintiff, so that arrangements may be made to secure the Plaintiff.Signed: September 2. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/2/10. (siw)

Download PDF
Bridges v. Murray et al Doc. 71 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 1:08CV13 DANNY RAY BRIDGES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) KEITH BYERS, CHAD MURRAY, ) KELLY ALDRIDGE, JOHN DOES, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) ORDER To: The Secretary of Corrections, North Carolina Department of Correction, Raleigh, NC To: U.S. Marshal, Western District of North Carolina To: Administrator, Alexander Correctional Institution 633 Old Landfill Road Taylorsville, NC 28681 THIS MATTER is before the Court upon its own Motion. The matter is hereby set for trial for the December 6, 2010 term at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 401 W. Trade St. Charlotte, North Carolina 28202. The North Carolina Department of Corrections is ordered to transport the Plaintiff, Danny Ray Bridges (inmate #0044717, DOB 4/14/1960), so that he may be present for the conduct of such trial. The Department is further ordered to notify the United States Marshal for the Western District of North Carolina of the transportation schedule for the Plaintiff, so that arrangements may be made to secure the Plaintiff. Signed: September 2, 2010 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?