Synovus Bank v. Karp et al

Filing 110

ORDER that because the parties have resolved the award of attorneys' fees on their own, no further Order from the Court is necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 8/14/13. (nll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION SYNOVUS BANK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JAMES G. KARP, G. DANIEL SIEGEL, ) and THE KARP FAMILY LIMITED ) PARTNERSHIP, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) SYNOVUS BANK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BARRON S. WALL, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH ) CAROLINA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) KEVIN J. TRACY, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Civil No. 1:10-cv-172 Civil No. 1:10-cv-201 Civil No. 1:10-cv-202 NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY J. BARBIERI, Defendant. NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Plaintiff, v. 3GMA REALTY, LLC; and GERALD M. ABATEMARCO, Defendants. SYNOVUS BANK, Plaintiff, v. GREGORY S. KEARY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2 Civil No. 1:10-cv-215 Civil No. 1:10-cv-217 Civil No. 1:10-cv-218 NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Plaintiff, v. BENJAMIN W. ATKINSON; and DANIEL S. HINKSON, Defendants. NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Plaintiff, v. KATHERINE H. WILLIAMS, Defendant. SYNOVUS BANK, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA M. TRACY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 1:10-cv-220 Civil No. 1:10-cv-221 Civil No. 1:10-cv-231 Previously, the Court granted the Motion to Compel filed by Plaintiff. In addition, the Court awarded Plaintiff its reasonable costs, including attorneys’ fees in bringing the motion. The Court directed Plaintiff to file an affidavit and supporting documents setting forth their attorneys’ fees within ten (10) days of the entry of the Order. 3 The Court provided Defendants with five (5) days to object to the amount of the fees. Subsequently, Defendants agreed to pay Plaintiffs $2000.00 in attorneys’ fees and not to appeal the Court’s Order to the District Court. Upon a review of the record in this case, the Court finds that the stipulation as to the amount of costs reached by the parties is reasonable. Because the parties have resolved the award of attorneys’ fees on their own, no further Order from the Court is necessary. Signed: August 14, 2013 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?