Synovus Bank v. Karp et al

Filing 144

JUDGMENT in favor of Synovus Bank against Anthony J. Barbieri, Barron S. Wall, Kevin J. Tracy, Patricia M. Tracy. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 1/17/2014. (thh)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION SYNOVUS BANK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) JAMES G. KARP, G. DANIEL ) SIEGEL, and THE KARP FAMILY ) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________ ) ) SYNOVUS BANK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BARRON S. WALL, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ ) ) SYNOVUS BANK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) KEVIN J. TRACY, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ ) Civil No. 1:10cv172 Civil No. 1:10cv201 Civil No. 1:10cv202 NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ANTHONY J. BARBIERI, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ ) ) NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH ) CAROLINA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) 3GMA REALTY, LLC, and GERALD ) ABATEMARCO, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________ ) ) SYNOVUS BANK, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) GREGORY S. KEARY, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ ) 2 Civil No. 1:10cv215 Civil No. 1:10cv217 Civil No. 1:10cv218 NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BENJAMIN W. ATKINSON and ) DANIEL S. HINKSON, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________ ) ) NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH ) CAROLINA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) KATHERINE H. WILLIAMS, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ ) SYNOVUS BANK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) PATRICIA M. TRACY, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ ) 3 Civil No. 1:10cv220 Civil No. 1:10cv221 Civil No. 1:10cv231 JUDGMENT For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum of Decision and Order entered contemporaneously herewith, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff Synovus Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 83] is GRANTED, and the Plaintiff is entitled to judgment against the following Borrowers as follows: (1) The Plaintiff is hereby awarded against the Defendant Barron S. Wall the sum of Five Hundred and Fourteen Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty-Four Dollars and One Cent ($514,334.01), together with prejudgment interest of Fifteen Thousand Three Hundred and Forty Two Dollars and Ninety Cents ($15,342.90), calculated at a rate of $77.10 per diem from and after July 1, 2013 through the date of Judgment; (2) The Plaintiff is hereby awarded against the Defendant Kevin J. Tracy the sum of Three Hundred and Ninety Thousand Eight Hundred and Seventy-Seven Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($390,877.37), together with prejudgment interest of Eleven Thousand Four Hundred and Two Dollars and Seventy Cents ($11,402.70), calculated at a 4 rate of $57.30 per diem from and after July 1, 2013 through the date of Judgment; (3) The Plaintiff is hereby awarded against the Defendant Anthony J. Barbieri the sum of Three Hundred and Ninety-One Thousand Two Hundred and Ninety-Two Dollars and Sixteen Cents ($391,292.16), together with prejudgment interest of Eleven Thousand and Fifty-Six Dollars and Forty-Four Cents ($11,056.44), calculated at a rate of $55.56 per diem from and after July 1, 2013 through the date of Judgment; and (4) The Plaintiff is hereby awarded against the Defendant Patricia M. Tracy the sum of Three Hundred and Fifty-Three Thousand Six Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Three Cents ($353,604.33), together with prejudgment interest of Six Thousand Eight Hundred and Three Dollars and Eighty-One Cents ($6,803.81), calculated at a rate of Thirty-Four Dollars and Nineteen Cents ($34.19) per diem from and after July 1, 2013 through the date of Judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: January 17, 2014 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?