Synovus Bank v. Karp et al

Filing 79

ORDER amending section III of 59 Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 6/20/13. (nll)

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00172-MR-DLH

SYNOVUS BANK,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JAMES G. KARP, G. DANIEL
)
SIEGEL, and THE KARP FAMILY
)
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________ )
)
SYNOVUS BANK,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BARRON S. WALL,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_______________________________ )
)
SYNOVUS BANK,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
KEVIN J. TRACY,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_______________________________ )

Civil No. 1:10cv172

Civil No. 1:10cv201

Civil No. 1:10cv202

NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH
CAROLINA,

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ANTHONY J. BARBIERI,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_______________________________ )
)
NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH
)
CAROLINA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
3GMA REALTY, LLC, and GERALD
)
ABATEMARCO,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________ )
)
SYNOVUS BANK,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
GREGORY S. KEARY,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_______________________________ )
)
NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH
)
CAROLINA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
2

Civil No. 1:10cv215

Civil No. 1:10cv217

Civil No. 1:10cv218

)
vs.
)
)
BENJAMIN W. ATKINSON and
)
DANIEL S. HINKSON,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________ )
)
NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH
)
CAROLINA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
KATHERINE H. WILLIAMS,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_______________________________ )
)
SYNOVUS BANK,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
PATRICIA M. TRACY,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_______________________________ )

Civil No. 1:10cv220

Civil No. 1:10cv221

Civil No. 1:10cv231

ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte.
Upon request of the parties, the Court hereby amends the Pretrial
Order and Case Management Plan in order to allow the parties to file one
3

(1) master brief and case-specific briefs in connection with any dispositive
motions that will be filed.
Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Section III of the
Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan [Doc. 59] is hereby AMENDED
so as to allow any party submitting a dispositive motion, such as a motion
for summary judgment, to file a master brief or memorandum, not to
exceed twenty-five (25) pages, setting forth the issues of fact and
questions of law applicable to all claims for which relief is sought. An
additional case-specific brief, not to exceed five (5) pages, may be filed in
each individual case addressing issues of fact and questions of law unique
to that case.

Any party responding to a dispositive motion may file a

master brief, not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages, and an additional
case-specific response brief, not to exceed five (5) pages.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed: June 20, 2013

4