Pitman v. Bayer Corporation et al
ORDER granting 9 Motion to Stay Proceedings pending transfer by the Judicial Panel on MDL; granting 11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re 5 Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 10/19/10. (nll)
- D L H Pitman et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
D o c . 18
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA A S H E V IL L E DIVISION 1 :1 0 cv 1 9 6 M . P., minor by and through her G u a rd ia n Ad Litem, GREGORY P IT M A N , et al., P l a i n t if f , V s. B A Y E R CORPORATION, et al., D efen d a n ts. _______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
T H IS MATTER is before the court on the consent Motion to Stay Proceedings a n d consent Motion to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint. Having considered th e consent motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.
ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the consent Motion to Stay
P ro ceed in g s (#9) and consent Motion to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint ( # 1 1 ) are GRANTED, all proceedings in this matter are STAYED pending transfer b y the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, and defendants are allowed up to and in clu siv e of the time that may be directed by the MDL Panel to so Answer or o th e r w is e respond to the Complaint or 30 days from any Order denying transfer, w h ic h e v e r is later.
Signed: October 19, 2010
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?