RDLG, LLC v. RPM Group, LLC et al

Filing 173

ORDER denying with and without prejudice 147 Motion in Limine. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 1/6/15. (ejb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:10cv204 RDLG, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RPM GROUP, LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) ORDER Pending before the Court is the Motion in Limine [# 147]. Defendant Fred Leonard (“Defendant”) moves to exclude any evidence related to any alleged verbal amendments to the final marketing agreement between the parties. On December 5, 2014, the Court held the Final Pretrial Conference in this matter and heard oral argument as to the pending Motions in Limine. To the extent that Defendant seeks to exclude the factual allegations as set forth in paragraphs 38-39 of the Amended Complaint, the Court DENIES the motion [# 147]. By virtue of the Court’s prior Orders, Defendant has admitted to the factual allegations as set forth in the Amended Complaint; the Jury will receive a copy of and/or be read those allegations in open court. Defendant may not contest these factual allegations at trial. -1- To the extent that Defendant seeks to exclude specific testimony as to verbal amendments to the marketing agreement that are not contained in the factual allegations as set forth in the Amended Complaint, the Court DENIES without prejudice the motion [# 147]. The Court INSTRUCTS Plaintiff that prior to offering such testimony to inform the Court, and the Court will allow Defendant an opportunity to renew its motion. The Court will then consider the motion in light of the evidence at trial. Signed: January 6, 2015 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?