RDLG, LLC v. RPM Group, LLC et al
Filing
91
ORDER directing a pretrial conference to be held (See Order for Further Details) ( Pretrial Conference set for 10/3/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom 2, 100 Otis St, Asheville, NC 28801 before Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 09/06/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
1:10cv204
RDLG, LLC,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
Vs.
RPM GROUP, LLC; RPM GROUP
BROKERAGE, LLC; FRED M.
LEONARD, III; JESSICA LEWIS
LEONARD; JASON BENTON;
NICK JAMES; and DEXTER
HUBBARD,
Defendants.
_______________________________
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the undersigned after a review of the pleadings in
this matter by the Court in preparation for the trial setting of this matter as the first
case for trial during the October 15, 2012 session of court in Asheville, North
Carolina. A pretrial conference will be held in this case on October 3, 2012 at 9:30
a.m. and shall be in accordance with the Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan
entered in this matter and more particularly the section of the Pretrial Order entitled
“V - TRIAL PROCEDURES”. Counsel for plaintiffs and defendants RPM Group,
LLC, RPM Group Brokerage, LLC and Fred M. Leonard, III are required to be
-1-
present. Also required to be present are the pro se defendants, Jessica Lewis-Leonard
and Jason Benton. Both the represented parties and the pro se parties are directed to
review the Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan and particularly review the
portion of the Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan entitled “V-TRIAL
PROCEDURES”. The parties are further directed to be in compliance with all
provisions of the Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan as of the date and time of
the pretrial conference.
Signed: September 6, 2012
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?