Chapman v. Rhoney et al

Filing 44

ORDER granting 39 Motion to Stay this case pending the Individual Defts' appeal of the qualified immunity issue; and denying as moot 41 Deft City of Hickory's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Pltf's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 6/18/12. (ejb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:10-cv-00258-MR-DSC GLEN EDWARD CHAPMAN, Plaintiff, v. DENNIS ALVIN RHONEY, in his individual capacity, ROBERT A. MULLINAX, as Public Administrator of the ESTATE OF MARK RICHARDSON SAMS, in his individual capacity, and CITY OF HICKORY, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on "Defendants Dennis Alvin Rhoney and Robert A. Mullinax, as Public Administrator of the Estate of Mark Richardson Sams' Motion to Stay This Matter Pending Appeal" (Doc. 39) filed on June 14, 2012. Upon review of Defendants' Motion, the Court concludes that the Motion to Stay should be allowed. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that "Defendants Dennis Alvin Rhoney and Robert A. Mullinax, as Public Administrator of the Estate of Mark Richardson Sams' Motion to Stay This Matter Pending Appeal" (Doc. 39) is GRANTED and the case is stayed pending the Individual Defendants' appeal of the qualified immunity issue. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant City of Hickory's "Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint" (Doc. 41) filed on June 15, 2012, is DENIED AS MOOT. SO ORDERED. Signed: June 18, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?