Phillips et al v. Albany International Corporation et al
Filing
125
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 121 Motion to Seal Document [112-3] Exhibit C of 112 Response in Opposition to Motion. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 4/29/15. (ejb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00262-MR
ERIK ROSS PHILLIPS, et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL
)
CORPORATION, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Seal
Document and for Order to Show Cause How Document was Obtained.
[Doc. 121].
Defendant Pneumo Abex LLC (“Abex”) has responded to
Plaintiffs’ motion. [Doc. 123].
Plaintiffs’ motion to seal and to show cause relates to Document 1123 as listed on the Clerk’s Docket in this matter. Plaintiffs ask the Court to
seal such document and to order Abex to reveal the source that provided
Abex such document. Abex does not object to the Court sealing Document
112-3. Further, Abex has indicated in its response the source of Document
112-3. Therefore, the Court concludes Plaintiffs’ motion should be allowed
in part.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiffs’ motion [Doc. 121]
is GRANTED in part, and the Clerk is hereby directed to place Document
112-3, as listed on the Clerk’s Docket in this matter, under seal herein; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiffs’ motion [Doc. 121], to
the extent that it seeks from Defendant Pneumo Abex LLC information
regarding its source of Document 112-3, is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: April 29, 2015
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?