Synovus Bank v. Greer et al

Filing 16

ORDER granting 14 Motion to Vacate Judgment and for Leave to Amend Complaint, and 8 Clerk's Entry of Default, 12 Default Judgment are hereby VACATED; and Pltf shall file an Amended Complaint reflecting its revised calculations within 14 days of entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 7/3/12. (ejb)

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:11cv26

SYNOVUS BANK,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ROBERT J. GREER and
)
JOANNE P. GREER,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________ )

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate
Judgment and for Leave to Amend Complaint [Doc. 14].
I.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The Plaintiff Synovus Bank ("Bank") filed a Complaint against the

Defendants Robert J. Greer and Joanne P. Greer on February 7, 2011. [Doc.
1]. Each Defendant was served via certified mail on February 14, 2011, but
neither responded to the Complaint. On March 23, 2011, the Bank filed a
Motion for Entry of Default. [Doc. 7]. Default was entered on April 5, 2011.
[Doc. 8]. On June 13, 2011, the Bank filed a Motion for Entry of Default
Judgment with a supporting brief. [Docs. 10, 11]. On June 16, 2011, the
Clerk entered a Default Judgment against the Defendants. [Doc. 12].

The Bank now moves the Court for an Order vacating the Default
Judgment and granting the Bank leave to file an Amended Complaint. [Doc.
14].
II.

DISCUSSION
Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, in pertinent

part, that "[a] default judgment must not differ in kind from, or exceed in
amount, what is demanded in the pleadings." Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(c). "A default
judgment that impermissibly grants relief beyond the pleadings is void and
may be set aside under Rule 60(b)(4)."

10 Moore's Federal Practice §

54.71[1] (Matthew Bender 3d ed.) (citing Compton v. Alton S.S. Co., 608 F.2d
96, 106 (4th Cir. 1979)).
In the present case, the Bank's Complaint indicated that as of February
4, 2011, the balance due and owing from the Defendants after application of
the proceeds from the foreclosure sale was $323,118.68. [Doc. 1 at ¶17].
Subsequently, in preparing to file its Motion for Entry of Default Judgment
after the Defendants failed to appear or otherwise defend this action, the Bank
checked its computation of the amounts due and revised its calculations. The
revised calculations are set forth in the Affidavit of Amy Staggs, which was
attached as Exhibit A to the Brief in Support of Motion for Entry of Default

2

Judgment.

Staggs' Affidavit indicates that as of June 6, 2011, the total

amount due and owing was $333,361.94. [Staggs Aff., Doc. 11-1 at ¶12].
The Default Judgment subsequently entered by the Clerk on June 16, 2011
reflected this amount. [See Doc. 12].
Using the total amount due and pre-judgment interest rate as described
in the Complaint at ¶17, the amount of the Default Judgment entered on June
16, 2011 would have been $330,807.68.1 The award in the Default Judgment,
$333,361.94, is $2,554.26 higher than this figure.

Because the Default

Judgment is in excess of the original amount requested, it is inconsistent with
the requirements of Rule 54.
The Court finds that it is in the interest of all parties for the Judgment
entered in this matter to comport with the Rules and otherwise be valid in all
respects. Accordingly, the Court will grant the Bank's request that the Default
Judgment be vacated and that the Bank be granted leave to file an Amended
Complaint reflecting its revised calculations. See Silge v. Merz, 510 F.3d 157,
162 (2d Cir. 2007).

1

This sum represents the outstanding amount due, $323,118.68, plus an award
of pre-judgment interest of $7,689.00, calculated at a rate of $58.25 per day from
February 4, 2011 through June 16, 2011.
3

Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion
to Vacate Judgment and for Leave to Amend Complaint [Doc. 14] is
GRANTED, and the Entry of Default entered on April 5, 2011 [Doc. 8] and the
Default Judgment entered on June 16, 2011 [Doc. 12] are hereby VACATED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days of the entry
of this Order, the Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint reflecting its
revised calculations.

Such Amended Complaint shall be served on the

Defendants pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and
the Defendants shall have the opportunity answer or otherwise respond to the
Amended Complaint within the time frame set out by Rule 15(a)(3) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: July 3, 2012

4