Deerborne Cottages, L.L.C. et al v. First Bank et al

Filing 30

ORDER granting 26 Motion to Join First Banks' Motion to Dismiss, and Deft Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for The Bank of Asheville is allowed to join the Motion To Dismiss previously filed by Deft First Bank, Successor to The Bank of Asheville. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 10/03/11. (emw) Modified text on 10/3/2011 (emw). NEF Regenerated (ejb).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:11 cv 178 DEERBORNE COTTAGES, L.L.C., a North Carolina Limited Liability Corporation; MICHAEL ROBINSON; CLARENCE F. McLEAN, and SCOVILLE ROBERTS, ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Vs. ) ) FIRST BANK, Successor to The BANK ) OF ASHEVILLE; the FEDERAL ) DEPOSIT INSURANCE ) CORPORATION (FDIC as Receiver for ) The Bank of Asheville); WESTSTAR ) FINANCIAL SERVICES ) CORPORATION; G. GORDON ) GREENWOOD; and RAYNIA J. ) WHITE ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court upon a motion entitled “Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s Unopposed Motion to Join First Bank’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1823(e)” (#26). It appears from the motion that good cause has been shown for the granting of said motion, Plaintiffs’ counsel has been consulted and Plaintiffs’ counsel does not oppose the relief requested in the motion. The motion will be allowed. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the motion entitled “Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s Unopposed Motion to Join First Bank’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1823(e)” (#26) is hereby ALLOWED and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Defendant herein, as receiver for The Bank of Asheville is allowed to join the Motion To Dismiss previously filed by Defendant First Bank, Successor to The Bank of Asheville. Signed: October 3, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?