Serefex Corporation v. Hickman Holdings, LP et al

Filing 133

ORDER denying 129 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; and denying 130 Motion for Leave to Appear Special Admission. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 11/3/11. (ejb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
1:11 CV 255

SEREFEX CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
v.
BILTMORE INVESTMENTS, LTD.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

Pending before the Court are the Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice
[# 129] and the Motion for Leave to Appear Special Admission [# 130]. Michael
P. Marsalese, Esq. moves for leave to appear pro hac vice in this case and for leave
to appear by special admissions without associating with local counsel. Mr.
Marsalese is not a member of the North Carolina bar and is not licenced to practice
in this Court. He has not paid the admission fees and has not associated with local
counsel as required by Local Rule 83.1(D)(1) to appear pro hac vice. Accordingly,
the Court DENIES the Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice [# 129].
Moreover, the Court DENIES the Motion for Leave to Appear Special Admission
[# 130]. The Court will not grant Mr. Marsalese leave to practice in this Court by
special admission pursuit to Local Rule 83.1(D)(2). If Mr. Marsalese wants to be
admitted pro hac vice in this case, he must associate himself with local counsel
who is admitted in this Court and pay the admission fee.

Signed: November 3, 2011

2