Littleton v. Harkleroad et al

Filing 32

ORDER denying 31 Plaintiff's Motion for Evidence. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 02/20/2013. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
1:11-cv-265-RJC
WILLIAM ANDREW LITTLETON,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
SID HARKLEROAD, et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
___________________________________ )

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Evidence, (Doc. No.
31). In support of such motion, Plaintiff states that he requests medical records from the North
Carolina Department of Public Safety “to show actual medical diagnosis for various conditions.”
(Doc. No. 31 at 1). Plaintiff’s motion is denied because discovery has not commenced. Once
discovery commences, Plaintiff should seek this discovery from the sole remaining Defendant
Randy Teague directly rather than filing a motion with the Court. The Court will enter a Pretrial
Order and Case Management Plan in this matter in a separate order forthwith.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Evidence, (Doc. No. 31),
is DENIED.

Signed: February 20, 2013