Matthews v. Nypro

Filing 5

AMENDED ORDER Dismissing WITHOUT prejudice 1 Complaint, amending 4 Order. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 1/30/12. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:11CV314

ANGEL DENISE MATTHEWS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
NYPRO,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

AMENDED ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte.
On November 18, 2011, the Plaintiff filed an Application seeking to
proceed with her civil action without the prepayment of fees and costs. [Doc.
2]. On December 9, 2011, the Court denied the Plaintiff’s Application without
prejudice but allowed her thirty (30) days in which to file an Amended
Application. [Doc. 3 at 2-3]. The Plaintiff was warned: “Failure to file an
Amended Application within thirty (30) days of this Order could result in
summary dismissal of this action.”

[Id. at 3].

To date, no Amended

Application has been filed. As the Plaintiff has failed to file an Amended
Application, her Complaint shall be dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s
Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed: January 30, 2012

2