Humphries v. USA
Filing
2
ORDER that no later than sixty (60) days from the entry of this Order, the United States Attorney shall file an Answer or other responsive pleading to Petitioners Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 10/19/12. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nll)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:12-cv-56-MR
[CRIMINAL CASE NO. 1:09-cr-87-MR-1]
CHAD STEVEN HUMPHRIES,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
vs.
)
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Respondent.
)
_______________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion under 28,
United States Code, Section 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence
by a Person in Federal Custody [Doc. 1].
The Court has conducted an initial screening of the petition under Rule
4(b) of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings for the United States District
Courts and finds: (1) the petition has been signed under penalty of perjury,
Rule 2(b)(5), Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings; (2) that Petitioner has
argued that the petition is timely under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f) because it was
filed within one year of United States v. Simmons, 649 F.3d 237 (4th Cir.
2011); and (3) Petitioner has asserted a colorable claim for relief cognizable
under § 2255(a). Upon consideration of the motion and the record of prior
proceedings, the Court determines that the United States Attorney should file
a response to Petitioner’s allegations. The Court will direct that the United
States file an Answer or other responsive pleading in this case within sixty
(60) days.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that no later than sixty (60) days from
the entry of this Order, the United States Attorney shall file an Answer or other
responsive pleading to Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct
Sentence.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: October 19, 2012
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?