Humphries v. USA

Filing 9

ORDER that Petitioner shall respond to the pending Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 7] no later than sixty (60) days from entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 1/17/13. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00056-MR [CRIMINAL CASE NO. 1:09-cr-00087-MR-1] CHAD STEVEN HUMPHRIES, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) ________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on its own motion following the filing of Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss on January 3, 2013. [Doc. 7]. In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Petitioner, who is proceeding pro se, that he has a right to respond to Respondent’s motion. The Court also advises Petitioner that failure to respond may result in dismissal of his petition. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner shall respond to the pending Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 7] no later than sixty (60) days from entry of this Order. Failure to file a timely response will likely lead to the dismissal of this lawsuit. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to the pro se Petitioner by certified U.S. mail, to the following address: Chad Stevens Humphries, 23644-058, Edgefield Federal Correctional Institution, Inmate Mail/Parcels, P.O. Box 725, Edgefield, SC 29824. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: January 17, 2013 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?