TD Bank, N.A. v. Reynolds Mountain Land Company, LLC et al

Filing 5

ORDER that on or before June 5, 2012, the defendants shall file a response disclosing the names and citizenships, if any, of all the constituent members or partners of the above referenced LLC's, and, for any such constit uent members or partners that are limited liability companies or partnerships, to identify the citizenships of the respective constituent members or partners until all such constituents are fully identified. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 5/15/12. (nll)

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:12-cv-77 TD BANK, N.A., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) REYNOLDS MOUNTAIN LAND ) COMPANY, LLC, MARS HILL ) CROSSROADS, LLC, MICHAEL ) WERNER, and BENJAMIN GARFINKLE, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte to ascertain subject matter jurisdiction. The defendants Reynolds Mountain Land Company, LLC and Mars Hill Crossroads, LLC removed this action from state court based upon diversity jurisdiction (#1). In the Complaint, plaintiff alleges that Reynolds Mountain Land Compnay, LLC is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Florida and Mars Hill Crossroads, LLC is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Florida. Courts have an affirmative duty to question subject matter jurisdiction even when the parties have not done so. Interstate Petroleum Corp. v. Morgan, 249 F.3d 215 (4 th Cir. 2001); Plyer v. Moore, 129 F.3d 728, 732 n.6 (4th Cir. 1997), certiorari denied 524 U.S. 945, 118 S.Ct. 2359, 141 L.Ed.2d 727 (1998); 28 U.S.C. §1447(c)("If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded."). A limited liability company is a citizen of all states in which its constituent members are citizens. Carden v. Arkoma Associates, 494 U.S. 185, 110 S.Ct. 1015, 108 L.Ed.2d 157 (1990). The defendants have not disclosed in their Notice of Removal whether they have constituent members or partners and therefore will be required to do so. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that on or before June 5, 2012, the defendants shall file a response disclosing the names and citizenships, if any, of all the constituent members or partners of the above referenced LLC’s, and, for any such constituent members or partners that are limited liability companies or partnerships, to identify the citizenships of the respective constituent members or partners until all such constituents are fully identified. Signed: May 15, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?