Dickson v. United States of America

Filing 6

ORDER that this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 9/5/12. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nll)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:12cv122 MARY JOAN DICKSON, a/k/a MARY JOAN DICKSON-BURGIN, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. On June 4, 2012, the Plaintiff filed her Complaint and an Application to proceed without having to prepay the costs associated with prosecuting the matter. [Doc. 1, 2]. On June 11, 2012, the Court denied the Plaintiff’s Application to proceed in forma pauperis and gave the Plaintiff thirty (30) days to filed an amended application. [Doc. 3]. The Plaintiff filed her Amended Application on July 3, 2012. [Doc. 4]. On August 2, 2012, the Court found that the Plaintiff had sufficient resources from which to pay the filing fee for this action and denied her Application. [Doc. 5]. The Plaintiff was given thirty (30) days to pay the required filing fee. The Plaintiff further was warned: “Failure to pay the required filing fee will result in the dismissal of this action.” [Id. at 2]. More than thirty (30) days have now passed since the entry of the Court’s Order, and the Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee as required. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: September 5, 2012 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?