Dickson v. United States of America
Filing
6
ORDER that this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 9/5/12. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nll)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:12cv122
MARY JOAN DICKSON, a/k/a
MARY JOAN DICKSON-BURGIN,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_______________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte.
On June 4, 2012, the Plaintiff filed her Complaint and an Application to
proceed without having to prepay the costs associated with prosecuting the
matter. [Doc. 1, 2]. On June 11, 2012, the Court denied the Plaintiff’s
Application to proceed in forma pauperis and gave the Plaintiff thirty (30) days
to filed an amended application. [Doc. 3]. The Plaintiff filed her Amended
Application on July 3, 2012. [Doc. 4]. On August 2, 2012, the Court found
that the Plaintiff had sufficient resources from which to pay the filing fee for
this action and denied her Application. [Doc. 5]. The Plaintiff was given thirty
(30) days to pay the required filing fee. The Plaintiff further was warned:
“Failure to pay the required filing fee will result in the dismissal of this
action.” [Id. at 2]. More than thirty (30) days have now passed since the
entry of the Court’s Order, and the Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee as
required.
Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that this case is hereby
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: September 5, 2012
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?