Travis et al v. Hollifield et al
Filing
4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice.Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 08/13/12. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(emw)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:12cv160
PAUL K. TRAVIS; RHONDA A.
TRAVIS; K.F.T., a minor; and J.T.T.,
a minor,
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BURKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF )
SOCIAL SERVICES; BURKE
)
COUNTY GUARDIAN AD LITEM
)
OFFICE; CHERYL HOLLIFIELD;
)
AMBER MECIMORE; JOANNE
)
CARRICO; STEPHEN SCHOBERLE; )
LORI GEORIGE; and NANCY
)
EINSTEIN,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte.
On June 22, 2012, the Plaintiffs filed the present action and sought to
proceed without having to prepay the costs associated with prosecuting the
matter. [Docs. 1, 2]. On July 2, 2012, the Court found that the Plaintiffs had
sufficient resources from which to pay the filing fee for this action and denied
their Application. [Doc. 3]. The Plaintiffs were given thirty (30) days to pay
the required filing fee. The Plaintiffs further were warned: “Failure to pay the
required filing fee within the time required will result in the dismissal of
this action.” [Id. at 3]. More than thirty (30) days have now passed since the
entry of the Court’s Order, and the Plaintiffs have failed to pay the filing fee as
required.
Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that this case is hereby
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: August 13, 2012
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?