Irby et al v. United States of America

Filing 19

ORDER denying as moot 18 Motion to Amend Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 02/06/13. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(emw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:12cv173 RICHARD W. IRBY and RACHEL GEORGE, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) ORDER Previously, the Court granted the motion to withdraw filed by prior counsel for Plaintiffs, Mary Euler. (Order, Dec. 12, 2012.) The Court also directed Plaintiffs to either obtain new counsel or notify the Clerk in writing of their intention to proceed pro se. Subsequently, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Amend the Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan [# 18] to allow Plaintiff Richard Irby and Rachel George to proceed pro se. The pleading was signed by both parties. No such Order, however, is needed from the Court. Accordingly, the Court DENIES as moot the motion [# 18]. Plaintiffs have complied with the Court’s prior Order and filed a written intent to proceed pro se in this case. The Clerk has already updated the docket to reflect the address of each Plaintiff and indicated that they are both proceeding pro se in this case. Signed: February 6, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?