Leblow et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
Filing
15
ORDER denying 8 Motion for Waiver to the extent it seeks an Order allowing him leave to file pleadings electronically in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 10/22/2012. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
1:12cv246
JAMES R. LEBLOW and LAURA T.
LEBLOW,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING LP,
et al.
Defendants.
___________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
Pending before the Court is the Motion for Waiver [# 8]. Plaintiff James
Leblow moves the Court to allow him to file pleadings electronically despite the
fact that Plaintiff is proceeding in this case pro se. Pursuant to the Administrative
Procedures Governing Filing and Service by Electronic Means pro se parties may
not file pleadings through electronic means. Plaintiff James Leblow moves the
Court to deviate from the standard administrative procedures and allow him to file
pleadings electronically in this case. Upon a review of the record in this case and
Plaintiff James Leblow’s motion, the Court DENIES the motion [# 8] to the extent
it seeks an Order allowing him leave to file pleadings electronically in this case.
Pursuant to Section I.D.1 of the Administrative Procedures Governing Filing
-1-
and Service by Electronic Means the Court will allow Plaintiff James Leblow to
receive electronic notification of all pleadings pursuant to the email address:
resourceasset@hotmail.com
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to add the above email address to the docket for
Plaintiff James Leblow. Plaintiff Laura T. Leblow shall continue to receive copies
of pleadings mailed to the address on the docket. The Court INSTRUCTS
Plaintiff James Leblow that he cannot represent another plaintiff who is proceeding
pro se. Each plaintiff must sign all pleadings on his or her own behalf.
Signed: October 22, 2012
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?